What whether Gordon Ramsay didn’t pick a winner?

June 05th, 2008 | Category: TV News

Filed under: OpEd, Watercooler Talk, Hell’s Kitchen

Some of our readers have pointed out in the comments section of the Hell’s Kitchen episode reviews that Chef Gordon Ramsay shouldn’t pick any of the contestants to be the winner, considering they aren’t talented sufficient. I think some of them clearly aren’t executive chef level yet, though I think some of them could be absent from the weird pressures of reality TV. The winner of the show gets $250,000 and the executive chef job at the new London West Hollywood. Unlike

other seasons, that winner will actually work as the head of one of Ramsay’s own restaurants, so there is a lot riding on that.

But what whether he didn’t pick a winner?

Continue reading What whether Gordon Ramsay didn’t pick a winner?

Permalink | Email this | | Comments